Boy did I make a lot of obvious mistakes when implementing Depth and Complexity. In this series, I'm breaking down worksheets I used and re-writing them to improve my use of Depth and Complexity.
Here's the most common mistake I've seen in implementing Depth and Complexity. And I made it too!
These common Depth and Complexity handouts are packed with questions that don't even make sense!
I stopped and started with “What 👄 special writing techniques does the author use? List examples.”
All I did was ask students to list and explain three “disciplines.” Let’s take it a bit further!
It seems obvious, but if someone tells me what they’re wondering about, I shouldn’t move on to another topic!
“Define these terms in your own words” may contain depth and complexity… but it’s neither deep nor complex!
Yes, I actually gave my students this question: “How could two experts’ 👓 perspectives regarding information from this reading selection differ from one another?” yikes.
I want to go beyond just listing how a character changed. Let’s get students thinking about that change!
Let’s improve this “make a list” question to incorporate high level thinking.
Let’s improve this bland Depth and Complexity question by getting really specific.
Here’s another question from a worksheet I used to use: Do you notice any 🌀 patterns in this book? And then the next question moved on to another topic. Do you notice any 🌀 patterns in this book? Were there any ⚖️ ethical issues? What was the 🏛️ big idea? I was leaving so much […]
I used a Depth and Complexity Frame like this with my math students. Let’s look at how we could improve this. Some problems: It asks four unrelated questions. I want to build a sequence of questions that climbs Bloom’s Taxonomy. Most of the questions are naturally answered with “yes” or “no” or a list. Questions […]