The Byrdseed.TV registration window closes in less than a week! Check it out.

Byrdseed

  • About
  • Speaking
  • Puzzlements
  • ByrdseedTV
  • Big Ideas
  • Examples
  • Depth and Complexity
  • Archives

“Engagement” isn’t BAD, but…

This is a preview of a related Byrdseed.TV video.


“Engagement” is one of those things that’s a nice by-product but not a great goal.

Any lesson that is well-planned, well-scaffolded, builds to high levels of thinking, and is run by a competent teacher will naturally be “engaging.” But when we seek “engagement” as our actual goal, we end up with the educational equivalent of candy. We get a substance-free snack.

If I roll a dice to assign a random task, that’ll be more engaging than just picking the task myself. But I could also wear a clown wig. I could speak in a funny voice. I could roll a HUGE dice. That will be even more engaging, right!? I could stand on my desk and sing the directions. Engaging? You bet!

Engaging is actually quite easy. Anyone can do it; just like anyone can make a meal sweeter by adding more and more sugar.

“Sweet” is never the goal of a meal. And “engaging” isn’t the goal of a lesson. At least, it isn’t my goal!

I want to get students’ brains sweating. I want them thinking*.

And the beauty is, when we get kids thinking, we get “engagement” for free. Humans like to think in interesting ways. We LOVE to figure things out that are just out of reach. It releases waves of dopamine. Look at Sudoku, crossword puzzles, Wordle, or whatever the hot puzzle of the year is. The right amount of thinking is highly engaging – even if the task is a black-and-white, pencil-and-paper vocab puzzle.

So rather than trying to make boring lessons “engaging,” build well-scaffolded lessons that take students to high levels of thinking. You’ll never have to worry about being engaging. It’ll just happen!

Done For You!

There's actually a lesson at Byrdseed.TV that's specifically about this article. Check it out

This is an example of “Anti-Techniques”

These are ideas I used to believe that now I think aren't actually so great. Oops!

See other examples of “Anti-Techniques” ❯❯




📂 Also filed under Rethinking.

Want to share something?

Everything written here is licensed as CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted. What does this mean?


Privacy Policy • Disclosure



Copyright © 2009 - 2022 Byrdseed, LLC