I’m Ian Byrd. I co-wrote the book on Depth and Complexity with Lisa Van Gemert, and I’ve spent 15 years building hundreds of Depth and Complexity video lessons at Byrdseed.TV — the largest library of D&C activities anywhere.
Thousands of teachers use the 11 Depth and Complexity icons. You’ll find posters on their walls and icons on their worksheets.
But here’s the problem: the icons are the least important part of Depth and Complexity!
The biggest thing I’ve learned is that the icons don’t improve thinking. Teacher’s questions do. Sounds like nonsense? Read on!
Now, if you just need the 11 icons, use the list below. If you want students to think harder, keep reading for the question stems and sequences that actually make the icons work.
On this page:
- What Is Depth and Complexity?
- The 11 Icons
- Question Stems, Prompts, and Questions
- Frames and Graphic Organizers
- Common Mistakes
- Content Imperatives
- Examples by Subject
- Using the Icons in Your Classroom
- For Coordinators
- FAQ
- Resources
What Is the Depth and Complexity Framework?
A brief history lesson!
Bette Gould, Sandra Kaplan, and Sheila Madsen created the Depth and Complexity framework in the mid-90s. It was funded by the Jacob Javits Gifted and Talented Students Education Act. It was intended for use across grades K through 12. Read more about D&C copyright here.
Depth and Complexity is a thinking framework that help students examine any topic through specific lenses like patterns, ethics, perspectives, and change over time.
Depth means going deeper into one topic. The details, patterns, rules, and ethics within it. The Depth icons are: Big Idea, Essential Details, Language of the Discipline, Rules, Patterns, Ethics, and Unanswered Questions. Complexity means connecting outward. Across disciplines, over time, from multiple perspectives. The Complexity icons are: Change Over Time, Multiple Perspectives, Across Disciplines, and Trends.
But the icons are just the starting point. The full Depth and Complexity framework includes four parts:
- 11 Icons of Depth and Complexity (what most teachers know)
- 5 Content Imperatives (not necessary, but powerful)
- Universal Concepts and Generalizations (my favorite, but almost nobody uses this)
- Disciplinarian Thinking (how experts in a field actually think)
Most Depth and Complexity training stops at the icons.
The 11 Icons of Depth and Complexity
Here are all 11 icons of Depth and Complexity, with a plain-English description of what each one means. Each icon is a thinking prompt, not a worksheet label.
- 🏛️ Big Idea — The overarching concept. Not the topic. The idea underneath the topic.
- 🌻 Essential Details — The facts that actually matter. Not all of them. The essential ones.
- 👄 Language of the Discipline — The words experts use. Not vocabulary lists. The language that changes how you think about a subject.
- 🚦 Rules — The structure. Laws, hierarchies, norms. What happens when you break them.
- 🌀 Patterns — Repetitions you can predict. Unlike rules, patterns can break without consequence.
- ⚖️ Ethics — Dilemmas. Ambiguity. Problems with no clean answer.
- ⏳ Change Over Time — How something has evolved. Past, present, future.
- 👓 Multiple Perspectives — Different viewpoints on the same thing. Not just “how does Character X feel?”
- ❓ Unanswered Questions — What we don’t know. What we can’t know.
- 📚 Across Disciplines — Where this topic touches other subjects.
- 📈 Trends — What’s changing right now and why.
You don’t need all 11 at once. Pick 2-3 Depth and Complexity prompts per lesson. Go deep with those. The rest can wait.
Want the digital versions? I use emoji instead of the traditional Depth and Complexity icon images. They work in Google Docs, Slides, Word, and anything else students type in.
Depth and Complexity Question Stems, Prompts, and Questions
The icons of Depth and Complexity are only as good as the questions you pair with them. A weak question stem gets a weak answer, no matter which icon you attach. Whether you call them question stems, Depth and Complexity questions, or prompts, they all mean the same thing: the actual question a student sees.
Here’s the difference between a weak Depth and Complexity question stem and a strong one:
| Icon | Weak Stem | Strong Stem |
|---|---|---|
| 🚦 Rules | “What are the rules of…?” | “Which rule would matter most if…?” |
| 🌀 Patterns | “What patterns do you see?” | “What would have to change to break this pattern?” |
| ⚖️ Ethics | “What is the ethical problem?” | “Who benefits from this rule and who doesn’t?” |
| 👄 Language | “What vocabulary words are used?” | “How does an expert’s language change the way you think about this?” |
| 👓 Perspectives | “What is another perspective?” | “What would [specific person] say is wrong about this argument?” |
| ❓ Unanswered Questions | “What don’t we know?” | “What is something about this topic that might be unknowable?” |
These Depth and Complexity prompts (also called question stems) are what separate a thinking classroom from a labeling classroom. The icon tells you what to think about. The stem tells students how hard to think about it.
More Depth and Complexity question stems and examples: Building Question Sequences
Building a Question Sequence (the Byrdseed Question Ladder)
Single questions get single answers. Sequences build thinking. I call this approach the Byrdseed Question Ladder: start with a low-floor prompt and climb to something hard.
Here’s what a Depth and Complexity question ladder looks like:
- List as many 🚦 rules of earthquake safety as you can think of. (low floor — everyone can start)
- Pick three that you think are the most essential. (analysis)
- What ⚖️ problems prevent people from following each of these rules? (ethics + evaluation)
- How could we change the 👄 language of this rule to make it easier to follow correctly? (synthesis)
Each question feeds the next. You can’t do step 4 without doing step 3 first. That’s the power of sequencing Depth and Complexity prompts from low to high. I learned this by writing hundreds of Depth and Complexity video lessons at Byrdseed.TV over 15 years.
That question ladder is the single technique that improved my teaching the most.
Depth and Complexity Frames and Graphic Organizers
A Depth and Complexity frame is a graphic organizer built around the icons.
Instead of giving students a blank page, you give them a structure: 2-3 Depth and Complexity prompts arranged in a sequence, with space to write under each one.
Frames work because they make the question ladder visible. A student can see that question 1 leads to question 2, and question 2 leads to question 3. The frame IS the sequence.
The most common Depth and Complexity graphic organizer is a grid with icons across the top and topics down the side. But I’ve found that sequential frames (where each box builds on the last) produce better thinking than grids (where each box is independent).
I made this mistake early on. My first Depth and Complexity frames were just icon labels with blank spaces. The thinking was shallow because the structure didn’t build anywhere.
Full guide to Depth and Complexity frames and graphic organizers: Depth and Complexity Graphic Organizers
The Biggest Mistake Teachers Make with Depth and Complexity
Sticking an icon next to a low-level question.
“What are the 🚦 rules of this math problem?” That’s recall. A student copies the answer from their textbook. The icon didn’t change anything. It just added a picture.
Depth and Complexity alone is not enough. You need Bloom’s Taxonomy first. The Depth and Complexity icons tell you what to think about. Bloom’s tells you how hard to think about it. Depth and Complexity is not a worksheet system, not a poster system, and not a replacement for good questioning.
A weak question: “List the 🌻 details of photosynthesis.”
A strong question: “Which 🌻 detail of photosynthesis would matter most if plants could only do it for 6 hours a day?”
Same icon. Completely different thinking.
Before you plan a Depth and Complexity lesson, ask yourself: “Could a student answer this by copying from their notes?” If yes, the icon isn’t helping. Raise the thinking first, then add the icon.
I wrote more about this mistake (and the other four I’ve made) here: My Biggest Mistakes with Depth and Complexity
Content Imperatives in Depth and Complexity
The 11 icons get all the attention. But the Depth and Complexity framework has a second set of tools called Content Imperatives. In 15 years of training teachers on Depth and Complexity, I’ve met maybe a handful who use Content Imperatives. Most don’t know they exist.
| Icon | Name | What It Means |
|---|---|---|
| ⏺️ | Origin | Where did this come from? What problems led to its creation? |
| ⏬ | Contribution | What single factor had the biggest impact? |
| 🔄 | Convergence | What multiple factors combined to cause this? |
| ⏸️ | Parallel | What unexpected similarity exists between two unrelated things? |
| ↔️ | Paradox | What contradiction lives inside this topic? |
Content Imperatives push students to make connections the icons alone don’t reach. “Parallel” is especially powerful: comparing the American Revolution to a playground argument forces abstract thinking that no single Depth and Complexity icon produces.
Full guide: Differentiate Lessons with the Content Imperatives
Depth and Complexity Examples Across Subjects
Depth and Complexity isn’t a language arts framework that you awkwardly bolt onto math. Every subject has its own version of each icon. Here are Depth and Complexity examples across the four core subjects.
Depth and Complexity in Math
🚦 Rules are operations and properties. 🌀 Patterns are sequences and functions. ⚖️ Ethics shows up in statistics and data interpretation.
A strong Depth and Complexity math question: “Which mathematical rule would cause the most damage if it stopped working?” That’s Rules + Ethics, and it forces students to rank and justify. Another: “What 🌀 pattern do you see in the multiplication table that breaks when you get to prime numbers?”
Depth and Complexity in Science
🏛️ Big Ideas are scientific laws and theories. ⏳ Change Over Time is evolution, erosion, climate. 👄 Language of the Discipline is the precise vocabulary that separates a 4th grader from a biologist.
Example Depth and Complexity science question: “How has the 👄 language scientists use to describe atoms changed over the last 100 years?” That’s Language of the Discipline + Change Over Time.
Depth and Complexity in Social Studies
⚖️ Ethics is everywhere. 👓 Multiple Perspectives is the entire discipline. 🌀 Patterns in history predict the future.
Example: “Find a 🌀 pattern across three different revolutions. Does the pattern hold for a fourth?”
Depth and Complexity in Language Arts
📈 Trends in an author’s choices. 🏛️ Big Ideas as themes. ❓ Unanswered Questions the author left on purpose.
Example: “What ❓ question does the author never answer, and why do you think they left it open?”
The key is that Depth and Complexity doesn’t replace your subject. It gives your subject better questions.
How to Use Depth and Complexity Icons in the Classroom
Start with 2-3 Depth and Complexity icons, not 11
Pick the icons your students already understand intuitively. Ethics and Multiple Perspectives are usually the easiest entry points for Depth and Complexity. Add more over time. For ideas on introducing the Depth and Complexity icons to students, I have pre-made videos for each icon.
Write question stems, not icon labels
Students should see a question, not an icon with a blank space. The Depth and Complexity icons are for you, the planner. The student gets the question. I made this mistake early on and it didn’t work until I switched to writing actual question stems.
Use emoji instead of posters
Traditional Depth and Complexity icon images are hard to use digitally. Emoji Depth and Complexity icons work everywhere: Google Docs, Slides, Word, chat. Students can type them. I switched to emoji years ago and noticed something unexpected: students started using the icons in their own notes without being asked. When the tool is as easy as typing a character, students make it theirs.
Introduce with student interests first
Don’t open with “Today we’re learning about the Ethics icon.” Open with a dilemma they care about. Name the icon after they’ve already done the thinking. “What you just did? That’s Ethics.”
Let it be messy
I hand-draw icons when I teach. Students should feel like Depth and Complexity is a tool they sketch with a pencil, not a professionally designed thing they look at.
Depth and Complexity for Coordinators and Program Leaders
If you’re running a gifted program, Depth and Complexity implementation is one of the hardest things to get right. I’ve visited dozens of classrooms that say they use Depth and Complexity and seen the same thing: posters on the wall, icons on worksheets, and recall-level questions with pictures next to them.
Here’s the short version of what I tell coordinators:
- Check readiness first. Can the teacher write good questions without icons? If not, Depth and Complexity won’t fix that.
- Cover up the icons. Pull 5 assignments, cover the icons, read the questions. Are they good questions on their own?
- Focus on sequences. Single questions = shallow thinking. Question ladders = real Depth and Complexity.
- Know the four stages. In my experience, classrooms move through four stages with Depth and Complexity: Teacher assigns → Teacher names the tool → Students recognize the tools → Students use them unprompted. Most classrooms are stuck at stage 1.
Byrdseed.TV includes professional development videos on Depth and Complexity for your teachers, plus coordinator guides on implementation.
Depth and Complexity FAQ
What are the 11 Depth and Complexity icons?
The 11 Depth and Complexity icons are: Big Idea, Essential Details, Language of the Discipline, Rules, Patterns, Ethics, Change Over Time, Multiple Perspectives, Unanswered Questions, Across Disciplines, and Trends. Each icon is a thinking prompt that helps students examine content from a specific angle.
What are Depth and Complexity question stems?
Depth and Complexity question stems are the actual questions you attach to each icon. Instead of “What are the rules?”, a strong Depth and Complexity question stem is “Which rule would matter most if…?” The stem changes the thinking level, not just the topic.
What are good Depth and Complexity questions?
Good Depth and Complexity questions force students to justify, compare, and revise their thinking, not copy facts. The test: if a student can answer by looking at their notes, the question isn’t strong enough.
What are Depth and Complexity frames?
Depth and Complexity frames are graphic organizers built around the icons. They give students a visual structure for organizing their thinking around 2-3 icons in sequence, where each question builds on the previous one.
Who created the Depth and Complexity framework?
Dr. Sandra Kaplan, Bette Gould, and Sheila Madsen created Depth and Complexity in the mid-1990s at the University of Southern California, funded by the federal Jacob Javits Gifted and Talented Students Education Act.
What are Content Imperatives in Depth and Complexity?
Content Imperatives are a second set of 5 thinking tools in the Depth and Complexity framework: Origin, Contribution, Convergence, Parallel, and Paradox. They focus on connections and causation rather than the single-lens thinking of the 11 icons.
Is Depth and Complexity only for gifted students?
Depth and Complexity was created for gifted education, but the thinking tools work for any student ready to go beyond surface-level understanding. The framework works in grades 2 through 12.
How is Depth and Complexity different from Bloom’s Taxonomy?
Bloom’s Taxonomy tells you how hard students should think (remember, analyze, evaluate). Depth and Complexity tells you what to think about (patterns, ethics, perspectives). You need both. Depth and Complexity without Bloom’s produces icon-labeled recall questions that look sophisticated but aren’t.
How many Depth and Complexity icons should I use in one lesson?
Start with 2-3. Students can go deep with two or three Depth and Complexity prompts. They can’t go deep with eight. Pick the icons that will push the hardest thinking on this particular topic.
Depth and Complexity Resources
On this site:
- Introducing the Depth and Complexity Icons to Students — pre-made videos for each icon
- Emoji Icons for Depth and Complexity — digital-friendly replacements for the traditional images
- Depth and Complexity Alone Is Not Enough — why you need Bloom’s Taxonomy first
- Differentiate Lessons with the Content Imperatives — the second set of Depth and Complexity tools
- Depth and Complexity Graphic Organizers and Frames — structuring student work
- Depth and Complexity Question Sequences — building question ladders
- Depth and Complexity vs Bloom’s Taxonomy — you need both, and Bloom’s comes first
- My Biggest Depth and Complexity Mistakes — what not to do
- Books for Introducing Depth and Complexity — picture books that pair well with each icon
Individual Depth and Complexity icon deep dives:
- 👄 Language of the Discipline
- ⚖️ Ethics and Multiple Perspectives
- 🌀 Patterns and Rules
- ❓ Unanswered Questions
- ⏳ Change Over Time
- 🏛️ Big Idea
- 👓 Multiple Perspectives: Right and Wrong at the Same Time
More Depth and Complexity Resources
- My book: Gifted Guild’s Guide to Depth and Complexity — the practitioner guide I co-wrote with Lisa Van Gemert. (She owns the rights now!)
- Depth and Complexity activities: Byrdseed.TV is the largest Depth and Complexity lesson library in the world — hundreds of ready-to-use video activities built around the framework.
- Lisa Van Gemert’s Depth & Complexity Pages My co-author has also written extensively about depth and complexity.
- My former colleague Marcie has great examples of classroom Depth and Complexity.
Continue Reading: Introducing Depth and Complexity
Like what you read? Byrdseed.TV has 700+ ready-to-use video lessons for gifted students. Press play and your students are learning.
Try Byrdseed.TV free →